Continuous pentesting
Keep adversarial testing current between manual engagements, so meaningful changes can be tested instead of waiting for the next scheduled assessment.
Autonomous Adversarial Security
Know what an attacker can actually reach.
RedMaw is an autonomous adversarial security platform that continuously tests your applications, SaaS identities, internal infrastructure and AI systems to prove what an attacker can actually reach.
Each hop validated by successful exploitation
Attack surfaces changed. Security testing did not.
Modern companies do not have one attack surface. They have public applications, APIs, SaaS platforms, cloud identities, internal systems, developer tools, secrets, AI endpoints, models, and increasingly agents with access to business systems.
Security products usually inspect those environments separately. Attackers do not.
They start with whatever foothold works, then ask a simple question: what can I reach next?
A vulnerable endpoint can expose a credential. A credential can unlock a SaaS account. A SaaS integration can expose customer data. A malicious document can influence an AI system that has permission to call a production tool.
The individual weakness matters. The route it creates matters more.
Four surfaces. One adversary.
Where RedMaw tests
Each surface has its own techniques and boundaries. The question stays the same.
01
Applications
Attack your applications before attackers do.
Adversarial testing of the web applications and APIs you own and authorize, aimed at proving exploitability rather than reporting resemblance to a known pattern.
Example question
What can someone actually do with it?
02
SaaS & Identity
See what a compromised identity can actually reach.
Testing the customer-controlled identity and permission graph to establish what one compromised account, key or grant can actually expose.
Example question
If this account is compromised, which systems and sensitive records become reachable?
03
Internal Infrastructure
Assume breach. Now what?
Establishing which internal servers, routers and switches can actually be accessed from an authorized foothold, and what those systems expose. Access is demonstrated and reported, never disrupted.
Example question
If an attacker gains access to this internal service or credential, what high-value systems could become reachable next?
04
AI Systems
Attack models and agents before you trust them.
Adversarial testing of deployed AI systems and release pipelines, aimed at how the system behaves when the input is hostile rather than expected.
Example question
Can malicious content change what the AI reveals, ignores, or attempts to do?
A scanner finds weaknesses. RedMaw tries to use them.
A vulnerability scanner is useful because it gives broad, deterministic coverage of known weaknesses. Keep it. But finding a possible issue and proving attacker reachability are different jobs.
A scanner reports
What might be wrong.
An exposed service, an old package, a weak configuration, a suspicious endpoint. Broad coverage, deterministic, and worth keeping.
RedMaw asks
What happens when it is used.
The same weakness, exercised adversarially inside the approved scope, with the evidence of what actually succeeded.
The questions that change the answer
- Can the endpoint expose another user's record?
- Can the leaked credential authenticate successfully?
- Can the OAuth grant reach sensitive data?
- Can the model be manipulated into revealing hidden instructions?
- Can the finding still be exploited after the developer says it is fixed?
The point is not a longer list of findings.
It is to reduce uncertainty about which findings materially change what an attacker can reach.
Evidence can include
- The affected asset or identity
- The successful technique
- The access achieved
- The data or system reached
- The sequence that made the finding material
Where supported, evidence is signed and tamper-evident. Session recording and replay let security engineers inspect how the finding was produced. MITRE ATT&CK mapping gives a common technical language for the observed behavior.
Operating loop
Discover → Attack → Prove → Prioritize → Remediate → Re-attack
RedMaw turns security testing into a continuous operating loop.
- 01
Discover
Map the applications, identities, integrations, infrastructure and AI systems in authorized scope.
- 02
Attack
Execute adversarial technique against the environment as it is actually configured.
- 03
Prove
Capture evidence of what succeeded and what it reached.
- 04
Prioritize
Rank by reach and consequence, and identify path chokepoints.
- 05
Remediate
Hand engineering the path, the evidence and the fix that breaks it.
- 06
Re-attack
Re-test the path. A finding closes only when it can no longer be walked.
Re-attack feeds the next Discover. The loop does not restart from zero. It carries the security state forward.
A finding closes by proof, not by a checkbox.
Most security workflows lose authority at the moment a ticket is created. A scanner reports a weakness. A ticket is opened. Someone marks it Done. The organization assumes the exposure is gone.
RedMaw keeps the security state. The finding moves from discovered to validated, prioritized, assigned, remediated, retested, and finally closed or reopened.
A ticket can say Done. RedMaw still re-runs the attack.
RedMaw does not trust a checkbox. It re-hacks the fix.
Closed by proof
If the exploit path is gone, the finding closes. If it still works, the finding stays open or reopens with current evidence.
Continuous, not point-in-time.
A pentest is a snapshot. Your environment keeps changing after the report is delivered.
RedMaw runs on a continuous schedule, responds to deployment triggers, and runs AI security validation after model changes.
The goal is simple: test exposure closer to the moment it is introduced.
After the report ships
- Applications deploy
- APIs change
- Permissions drift
- SaaS integrations are added
- Secrets leak
- Models are retrained
Operating models
Run it, or have us run it.
One engine sits underneath each motion. The difference is who operates it.
01
Self-serve
Your team operates RedMaw directly: defines scope, runs testing, reviews evidence, manages findings and integrates remediation with existing engineering workflows.
02
Managed
RedMaw operators run and triage testing for you, while your organization retains authorization, scope and remediation ownership.
03
Dedicated
Larger and regulated teams use dedicated hosted environments, secure outbound connectivity for authorized internal reach, and custom integration options.
Evidence for the conversations security teams already have to win.
RedMaw helps produce defensible evidence for security reviews and compliance workflows.
- PCI DSS 4.0
- GDPR
- SOC 2 and ISO-oriented programs
- NIS2
- DORA
- EU AI Act
What this is not
RedMaw provides testing and evidence. It does not certify, audit, or make an organization compliant.
Solutions
Start with the security problem
The use case changes. The security lifecycle does not.
Security validation
Move from possible exposure to proven exposure by testing whether a weakness can actually create unauthorized access, data exposure or another material security outcome.
Attack-path validation
Prioritize security work by what a finding can reach, not only by the severity label attached to the weakness that started the investigation.
Technology and SaaS
Protect tenant data while product teams ship quickly, answer enterprise security reviews and introduce AI features that create new application and model attack surfaces.
Financial services
Continuously validate exposure around customer financial data, payment flows and regulated digital services while preserving evidence for resilience and DORA-oriented security programs.
Insurance
Validate the systems and identities around policyholder and claims data while supporting resilience, underwriting scrutiny and security programs that span modern and legacy technology.
Resources
Technical writing
BlogPerspective
The catalogue is not the boundary of the attack surface
A weakness does not start working on the day it gets an identifier. It was already working. The identifier is just when defenders found out.
· 5 min read
GuidesGuide
What DORA actually requires of security testing
DORA changes the testing conversation from isolated evidence toward an operating resilience process that can be demonstrated.
· 4 min read
ResearchResearch
Four surfaces, fragmented security ownership
Organizations assign security ownership by technology. Attackers organize around reachable trust.
· 3 min read
Stop assuming you are secure. Prove it.
Continuously test what an attacker can actually reach, fix what matters, and prove the exposure is gone.