Platform
A finding closes by proof, not by a checkbox.
RedMaw owns the security state behind each validated finding and sends remediation work into the tools your teams already use.
What usually happens
The ticket says Done.
A scanner reports a weakness. A ticket is opened. Someone marks it complete. The organization assumes the exposure is gone.
- Closure depends on a human assertion
- The same issue reappears as a new ticket next run
- Nobody re-tests the exploit
What RedMaw does
RedMaw still re-runs the attack.
The finding is the validated security condition, not the task. Closure is the result of a re-attack that fails.
- Closure depends on evidence
- A recurring issue updates one security record
- The exploit is attempted again after the fix
We own the findings brain. We rent the task UI.
Security findings and project-management tasks are not the same thing. Jira is good at coordinating work. GitHub Issues is good at coordinating engineering changes. Slack is good at communication.
None of those systems should be the authority on whether a vulnerability is still exploitable. RedMaw keeps that authority in the findings layer.
Lifecycle
A finding moves through security states, not a ticket queue.
Discovered
A potential issue or exposure is identified.
Validated
Adversarial testing proves exploitability or meaningful reachability. Until this point, it is not a finding.
Prioritized
The finding is ranked by materiality: the access, data, identity or attack path it enables.
Assigned
Remediation work is routed to the appropriate owner.
Remediated
The team indicates that the relevant change has been made.
Retested
RedMaw attempts the attack again.
Closed or reopened
The result of the retest becomes the authoritative security state.
Stop creating a new ticket for the same problem.
Continuous testing can create an operational mess if each run generates another copy of the same issue.
RedMaw's findings-state model is designed to correlate and deduplicate recurring exposure. If the same underlying weakness appears again, the existing security record is updated rather than spawning another disconnected task.
That preserves history and keeps the remediation conversation attached to the real issue.
Handoff
Put the work where engineering already lives.
RedMaw is not trying to replace the team's task system. Validated findings can be pushed into Jira, GitHub Issues, Slack and email. For workflows without a native connector, RedMaw provides an open webhook and API.
The handoff carries
- Proof of exploitation
- Affected asset or identity
- Attack context
- Remediation guidance
- A link back to the security finding
- Retest state
Roadmap: not shipped
- Bidirectional ticket synchronization
- Linear
- GitLab
- ServiceNow
The ticket is not the finding.
This distinction sounds small. Operationally, it changes everything.
A developer may mark a ticket complete because the code change shipped. A security engineer may accept the explanation. A project-management system may consider the work done.
None of those events proves the exploit is gone. RedMaw treats the successful retest as the closure event.
RedMaw does not trust a checkbox. It re-hacks the fix.
The remediation loop ends by repeating the relevant attack. There are only two outcomes.
The exploit no longer works
The weakness remains exploitable
The finding stays open, or reopens with current evidence. The team sees what still works and why the fix did not close the path.
No external tracker required
For teams that do not want another tool to adopt
The built-in findings view can act as the entire workflow. The underlying security model is the same whether you use it or route work elsewhere.
- Validated findings
- Only issues that adversarial testing has actually proven.
- Evidence
- The technical record of what succeeded and what it reached.
- Priority
- Ranked by what becomes reachable, not by a flat severity score.
- Status and owner
- Where the finding sits in its lifecycle and who holds it.
- Remediation guidance
- What to change so the exploit stops working.
- Retest result
- The outcome of the last re-attack, and the closure state.
Why this matters for continuous security
Without a stateful remediation loop, continuous testing becomes continuous notification. That is not progress.
The purpose of repeated testing is to reduce exposure over time. RedMaw therefore connects discovery to proof, proof to remediation, and remediation back to attack.
The loop is not complete until the fix survives the attack.
Stop assuming you are secure. Prove it.
Continuously test what an attacker can actually reach across your applications, SaaS identities, internal infrastructure and AI systems.