Technology and product companies
Security is one of ten things you own. It still has to hold up.
A prospect wants a pentest. Another sends an exhaustive security review. Engineering is shipping every week. You do not have time to build a red team just to prove that your product is secure.
Your red team, without the team.
The trigger
The security work arrives at the worst possible moment.
The enterprise deal is moving. Then security enters the process, and the prospect asks for:
- A recent penetration test
- Vulnerability-management evidence
- Remediation records
- SSO and access-control details
- Audit logging
- Answers to a long security questionnaire
- Proof that sensitive customer data is protected
None of those questions are unreasonable. The problem is that they land with the same person responsible for product, engineering, infrastructure, hiring, delivery and the next release.
You do not need another dashboard full of things that might be wrong.
Most small security teams do not suffer from a shortage of findings. They suffer from a shortage of time. A scanner can produce a long list of possible vulnerabilities, and the practical question is simply which of them someone can actually use.
What you get today
“The scanner says this is critical.”
A severity label, an asset, and a decision you have to make without knowing whether the issue is reachable.
What RedMaw gives you
“This is the weakness that exposed another customer's data.”
Or: this credential was live and created access to a sensitive service. That is a much easier engineering priority to defend.
Applications first
The product is the fastest route in.
For a technology company, the shortest path into the business is often the product itself. RedMaw continuously tests web applications, APIs, authentication, authorization, secrets, exposed services and business logic.
The goal is not to generate another checklist. It is to prove whether a weakness becomes unauthorized access, exposed data, or another meaningful security outcome.
SaaS and identity are part of your attack surface too.
The product is not the entire company. Your team also relies on source hosting, identity providers, cloud services, support platforms and productivity tools.
A compromised person can carry roles, permissions, OAuth grants, API tokens, external sharing rights and access to customer or company data. RedMaw evaluates the customer-controlled side of those relationships. It does not attack the SaaS provider.
AI
AI features need their own security loop.
If your product ships AI, the security review now includes questions traditional application testing does not answer. Can the model be prompt injected? Can it reveal a system prompt? Can it disclose sensitive information? Can a model update introduce a new jailbreak?
RedMaw supports AI red-teaming and can run adversarial validation in the CI or model-release pipeline after retraining or fine-tuning, so AI security becomes part of shipping rather than a one-time exercise.
Roadmap: not shipped
- Automated AI-agent tool-abuse testing
The finding does not disappear into Jira.
The common workflow: a tool finds something, a ticket is created, someone marks it Done, and everyone assumes the security issue is gone.
RedMaw keeps the security state instead.
Discovered
A potential issue or exposure is identified.
Validated
Adversarial testing proves exploitability or meaningful reachability.
Prioritized
Ranked by the access, data or path it enables.
Assigned
Routed to the owner who can change it.
Remediated
The team reports the change is made.
Retested
RedMaw re-runs the relevant exploit.
Closed or reopened
The retest result becomes the authoritative security state.
Evidence
Give the prospect evidence instead of another promise.
RedMaw produces executive and technical reporting from the same validated evidence, which gives you something usable for:
- Enterprise security reviews
- Customer assurance
- Board updates
- Vulnerability-management evidence
- SOC 2 / ISO-oriented workflows
- Penetration-testing discussions
- Remediation proof
What this does not replace
RedMaw provides testing and evidence. It does not replace an auditor, a certification body or any specifically mandated third-party assessment.
Operating model
Run it yourself, or have us run it.
Self-serve if your engineering or security team wants to own the operating loop. Managed if nobody has time to operate continuous adversarial testing: RedMaw operators run and triage it while your organization retains authorization, scope and remediation ownership.
The answer to “we have no team to run this” is: then do not build one just to operate the platform.
Outcome
What changes for the CTO
Not a longer list of possible problems. A shorter list of proven ones, and evidence that the fix held.
- Fewer theoretical findings competing for engineering time
- Reproducible evidence when something is actually exploitable
- Continuous testing instead of waiting for the next annual exercise
- Applications, SaaS & Identity and AI security in one operating model
- Remediation connected to existing engineering workflows
- Automatic retesting
- Reports that support customer and board conversations
Other roles