Careers
Build security systems that have to prove their own answer.
RedMaw is building an autonomous adversarial security platform that attacks authorized systems, validates what is actually exploitable, preserves the evidence, and re-tests the fix.
If that sounds like a better engineering problem than adding another severity score to another alert stream, you will understand what we are trying to build.
What we are building
Modern companies depend on applications, SaaS identities, infrastructure and AI systems. Security products often inspect those surfaces separately. Attackers do not.
RedMaw is built around a different question.
What can an attacker actually reach?
The product turns that question into a repeatable loop
- 01
Discover
Map the applications, identities, integrations, infrastructure and AI systems in authorized scope.
- 02
Attack
Execute adversarial technique against the environment as it is actually configured.
- 03
Prove
Capture evidence of what succeeded and what it reached.
- 04
Prioritize
Rank by reach and consequence, and identify path chokepoints.
- 05
Remediate
Hand engineering the path, the evidence and the fix that breaks it.
- 06
Re-attack
Re-test the path. A finding closes only when it can no longer be walked.
Re-attack feeds the next Discover. The loop does not restart from zero. It carries the security state forward.
Architecture
Proof is part of the architecture.
A finding should not become important simply because the system generated a confident answer. The product is designed around validation, which means:
- Attacks stay inside explicit authorization
- Evidence needs to be reproducible
- Scope needs to be enforced technically
- High-impact actions require appropriate control
- Findings have state
- Remediation is re-tested
- Closure comes from the result, not a checkbox
Those constraints are not implementation detail. They are the product.
The work spans several hard problems.
RedMaw sits where a number of disciplines meet:
- Offensive security
- Application security
- Identity and SaaS security
- AI security
- Infrastructure
- Distributed systems
- Evidence and provenance
- Workflow automation
- Security governance
- Product design for technical and non-technical users
Nobody is expected to know all of them. The interesting work is in making them function as one defensible system.
Engineering culture
How we think about building
We work from contracts, specifications, tests and verification rather than from confident assertions. That principle fits this product unusually well, because the product itself makes the same argument.
Do not trust the status. Verify the result.
The engineering culture should work the same way as the engine.
Open roles
Where we are hiring
No roles listed today
We are not listing open roles here today. If you are interested in the problems RedMaw is solving, check back as the team grows.
Stop assuming you are secure. Prove it.
Continuously test what an attacker can actually reach across your applications, SaaS identities, internal infrastructure and AI systems.