Skip to content
REDMAW

Integrations

Keep the security state in RedMaw. Put the work where your teams already operate.

RedMaw integrates with engineering, identity, SaaS, source, DNS and workflow systems so continuous adversarial testing fits your environment instead of forcing the environment to fit another standalone process.

19 available

6 on the roadmap

Integrations should remove operational friction.

RedMaw owns the finding. Your teams may already work in Jira, GitHub, Slack, identity platforms, SaaS administration and CI pipelines.

Connectors are plumbing, not the product. You buy security outcomes and scope. You should not have to count integrations.

How findings state works
  1. 01

    Bring authorized context in

    Identity, SaaS posture, source repositories and DNS zones, so RedMaw knows what is in scope and who can reach what.

  2. 02

    Send remediation work out

    Validated findings go to the tools your teams already use, with proof and guidance attached.

  3. 03

    Trigger validation on change

    CI, deployment and model-registry events run testing closer to the moment new exposure appears.

Ticketing and communication

Where remediation work goes. RedMaw keeps the finding; these systems coordinate the fix.

Jira

Available

Push validated findings with technical context, evidence, remediation guidance and a link back to RedMaw. The same finding updates the same issue rather than creating a duplicate on every continuous run.

GitHub Issues

Available

Route application and engineering findings into GitHub Issues with proof and remediation context, so the fix lives next to the code workflow.

Slack

Available

Notify owners when relevant findings appear or reopen. Routing gets the issue in front of the responsible team without making chat the authoritative security record.

Email

Available

Deliver finding notifications and reporting to teams that do not operate primarily in chat or ticketing platforms.

Linear

Roadmap

Native Linear integration is planned.

GitLab

Roadmap

Native GitLab issue integration is planned.

ServiceNow

Roadmap

A native ServiceNow connector is planned. Until then, the open webhook and API are the supported integration path.

Bidirectional ticket sync

Roadmap

Full two-way ticket-state synchronization is planned. The retest remains authoritative on security closure either way.

Open webhook and API

The escape hatch for systems without a native connector: a documented REST API and signed webhooks for finding events.

REST API

Available

Query findings, scope and security state programmatically, and connect custom remediation workflows.

Signed webhooks

Available

Receive finding events as they happen and route them into internal tools or systems such as ServiceNow, while RedMaw remains the authoritative finding state.

Identity

Enterprise authentication, user lifecycle, and the authorized identity context that SaaS & Identity testing reasons over.

SSO / SAML

Available

Enterprise authentication against your existing identity provider.

SCIM

Available

Provision and manage user access through your existing identity lifecycle.

IdP read for identity attack paths

Available

Authorized read-only identity context covering users, groups, roles and reachable SaaS relationships, used to model what a compromised identity can reach. Okta and Entra are supported examples.

Identity connectivity is not permission to attack outside scope. It is context for your own authorized identity environment.

Source and secrets

Repository and history analysis for exposed credentials, under a strict validation boundary.

GitHub

Available

Scan authorized repositories and history for exposed credentials. A credential associated with an owned target can enter supported validation; a third-party credential is reported as an exposure rather than used against somebody else's platform.

SaaS posture

Read-only connections to customer-controlled SaaS tenants, to assess posture and permissions.

Microsoft 365

Available

Roles, permissions, public sharing, OAuth applications and access configuration on your side of the tenant.

Google Workspace

Available

Customer-controlled identity, sharing and application access posture.

Salesforce

Available

Profiles, permission sets, connected applications and sharing configuration you control.

RedMaw tests your side of the shared-responsibility boundary. It does not attack the provider's underlying multi-tenant platform.

DNS providers

Prove control of a domain before active testing, and import DNS-zone assets into the authorized inventory.

Cloudflare

Available

One-click connection for domain verification and asset import.

Route 53

Available

Domain verification and DNS-zone asset import.

Akamai

Available

Domain verification and DNS-zone asset import.

GoDaddy

Available

Domain verification and DNS-zone asset import.

Manual ownership verification is always available too, via DNS TXT record, HTML file or meta tag.

CI and deployment triggers

Testing that runs when the environment changes, rather than when the calendar says so.

Deployment webhooks

Available

Trigger validation from your CI or deployment pipeline so testing runs closer to the point new exposure is introduced.

Model-registry and retraining events

Available

Trigger the AI adversarial suite against a candidate model and compare it against the last accepted security baseline.

SIEM and EDR

Comparing what RedMaw did against what your defenses detected.

SIEM / EDR ingest

Roadmap

Planned. The model is to compare executed adversarial activity against what the organization's defenses detected.

Detection-gap scoring

Roadmap

Planned. Would produce attack-vs-detection timelines and detection-coverage evidence.

Cloud

Cloud context is part of the integration architecture. Specific native cloud-security connectors are not published yet. This category will list them once product ownership confirms which are current. Route 53 is covered under DNS providers today.

Not published yet

Specific native cloud-security connectors are not listed here yet. This category will name them once product ownership confirms which are current. Inventing a vendor matrix would be worse than an honest gap.

Boundary

Connectivity is not permission.

An integration does not expand authorization. Every RedMaw test remains governed by the same controls, whatever is connected.

  • Explicit scope
  • Ownership verification
  • Authorization controls
  • Test mode
  • Approval gates where required

Connectivity is not permission.

Fit RedMaw into the security workflow you already have.

Connect the systems that define scope, supply context, receive remediation and trigger validation.

Request a demoExplore the platform