Skip to content
REDMAW

Applications

GraphQL Introspection & Batching Abuse

GraphQL can expose more schema or request volume than intended when introspection, batching, authorization and resource limits are poorly bounded.

RedMaw

Definition

GraphQL lets a client describe exactly what it wants. That is the feature. It also means the server must enforce authorization and resource limits per field and per resolver, rather than per endpoint.

Two distinct problems

Schema disclosure

Introspection describes the entire graph: types, fields, mutations, arguments. Where it is open to unauthenticated callers, it removes most of the discovery work and names the privileged operations directly.

Batching and volume

Batched or deeply nested queries let one request do a great deal of work. Without depth, complexity and rate controls, that becomes both a resource problem and a way to iterate through data faster than per-request monitoring expects.

Neither issue is inherently a breach. Both change what an attacker can find and how quickly.

Where it leads
  1. Internet
  2. GraphQL API
  3. Schema / Batch Abuse
  4. Privileged Resolver
  5. Sensitive Data

Each hop validated by successful exploitation

Tags

  • graphql
  • api
  • authorization

Validation

How RedMaw validates this attack

Validation runs only inside authorized scope, with agreed exploitation limits.

  1. 01Establish whether introspection is reachable and by whom
  2. 02Map mutations and resolvers that imply privilege
  3. 03Test authorization at resolver level rather than at the endpoint
  4. 04Establish whether batching or nesting bypasses rate and complexity controls

Stop assuming you are secure. Prove it.

Continuously test what an attacker can actually reach across your applications, SaaS identities, internal infrastructure and AI systems.