Use case
Compliance validation
Produce compliance-oriented evidence directly from the security-testing and remediation process instead of rebuilding the technical story separately when an audit or review begins.
The challenge
Where assumptions break down
Compliance evidence is often assembled after the security work has already happened. Policies live in one place, pentest reports in another, remediation in tickets and retest evidence somewhere else. That fragmentation makes it harder to explain what was actually tested, what was proven, what changed and whether the fix still holds when a customer, auditor, board or regulator asks.
How RedMaw approaches it
- 01RedMaw records authorized scope and the security validation performed against it.
- 02Validated findings preserve technical evidence, remediation context and reporting data.
- 03The findings-state layer keeps the lifecycle from discovery through remediation and retest.
- 04Report builder and evidence exports can map the resulting security work into supported compliance and assurance workflows.
- 05RedMaw supports evidence for PCI DSS 4.0, GDPR, SOC 2 and ISO 27001-oriented programs, NIS2 and DORA-oriented programs, and EU AI Act-oriented AI governance.
Outcome
What changes
Keep going
Related
Capabilities
- Application SecurityAdversarial testing of the web applications and APIs you own and authorize, aimed at proving exploitability rather than reporting resemblance to a known pattern.
- SaaS & IdentityTesting the customer-controlled identity and permission graph to establish what one compromised account, key or grant can actually expose.
- AI SecurityAdversarial testing of deployed AI systems and release pipelines, aimed at how the system behaves when the input is hostile rather than expected.
Stop assuming you are secure. Prove it.
Continuously test what an attacker can actually reach across your applications, SaaS identities, internal infrastructure and AI systems.